Precision of implant placement with stereolithographic templates: a pilot in vitro study.
Identifieur interne : 000C85 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000C84; suivant : 000C86Precision of implant placement with stereolithographic templates: a pilot in vitro study.
Auteurs : Hakan Bilhan [Turquie] ; Selda Arat ; Emre Mumcu ; Onur Geckili ; Olcay SakarSource :
- The Journal of oral implantology [ 0160-6972 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur (), Humains, Imagerie tridimensionnelle (), Mandibule (), Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique), Modèles anatomiques, Modèles dentaires, Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation), Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (instrumentation), Projets pilotes, Radiographie, Radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité, Reproductibilité des résultats.
- MESH :
- imagerie diagnostique : Mandibule.
- rééducation et réadaptation : Mâchoire édentée.
- instrumentation : Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur, Humains, Imagerie tridimensionnelle, Mandibule, Modèles anatomiques, Modèles dentaires, Planification des soins du patient, Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux, Projets pilotes, Radiographie, Radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité, Reproductibilité des résultats.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation), Dental Models, Humans, Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods), Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation), Mandible (diagnostic imaging), Mandible (surgery), Models, Anatomic, Patient Care Planning, Pilot Projects, Radiography, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated, Reproducibility of Results, Surgery, Computer-Assisted (methods).
- MESH :
- diagnostic imaging : Mandible.
- instrumentation : Dental Implantation, Endosseous.
- methods : Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Surgery, Computer-Assisted.
- rehabilitation : Jaw, Edentulous.
- surgery : Mandible.
- Dental Models, Humans, Models, Anatomic, Patient Care Planning, Pilot Projects, Radiography, Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated, Reproducibility of Results.
Abstract
This pilot study assesses the accuracy of 2 bone-supported stereolithographic surgical templates with respect to placement of implants in originally planned positions, and it tests the precision of dental volumetric tomography planning. Two mandibles retrieved from formalin-fixed human cadavers were scanned by dental volumetric tomography for planning of the implant positions, leading to stereolithographic models and fabrication of surgical guides. The situation immediately following drilling and implant insertion by an experienced surgeon was scanned and the outcome compared with the initial planning. The 3-dimensional discrepancies were then analyzed and determined. The results show deviations of the placed implants from the original planning, especially in the vertical direction, making the seating of a prefabricated denture impossible. At present, the flapless surgery technique based on stereolithographic surgical templates appears unsafe; further improvement is required.
DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00109
PubMed: 21126171
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:21126171Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Precision of implant placement with stereolithographic templates: a pilot in vitro study.</title><author><name sortKey="Bilhan, Hakan" sort="Bilhan, Hakan" uniqKey="Bilhan H" first="Hakan" last="Bilhan">Hakan Bilhan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul University, Istanbul</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Istanbul</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Arat, Selda" sort="Arat, Selda" uniqKey="Arat S" first="Selda" last="Arat">Selda Arat</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mumcu, Emre" sort="Mumcu, Emre" uniqKey="Mumcu E" first="Emre" last="Mumcu">Emre Mumcu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Geckili, Onur" sort="Geckili, Onur" uniqKey="Geckili O" first="Onur" last="Geckili">Onur Geckili</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sakar, Olcay" sort="Sakar, Olcay" uniqKey="Sakar O" first="Olcay" last="Sakar">Olcay Sakar</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2012">2012</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:21126171</idno><idno type="pmid">21126171</idno><idno type="doi">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00109</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000F21</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000F21</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000F21</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000F21</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000F21</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000F21</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Precision of implant placement with stereolithographic templates: a pilot in vitro study.</title><author><name sortKey="Bilhan, Hakan" sort="Bilhan, Hakan" uniqKey="Bilhan H" first="Hakan" last="Bilhan">Hakan Bilhan</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Turquie</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul University, Istanbul</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Istanbul</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Arat, Selda" sort="Arat, Selda" uniqKey="Arat S" first="Selda" last="Arat">Selda Arat</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mumcu, Emre" sort="Mumcu, Emre" uniqKey="Mumcu E" first="Emre" last="Mumcu">Emre Mumcu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Geckili, Onur" sort="Geckili, Onur" uniqKey="Geckili O" first="Onur" last="Geckili">Onur Geckili</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sakar, Olcay" sort="Sakar, Olcay" uniqKey="Sakar O" first="Olcay" last="Sakar">Olcay Sakar</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of oral implantology</title><idno type="ISSN">0160-6972</idno><imprint><date when="2012" type="published">2012</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous (instrumentation)</term><term>Dental Models</term><term>Humans</term><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional (methods)</term><term>Jaw, Edentulous (rehabilitation)</term><term>Mandible (diagnostic imaging)</term><term>Mandible (surgery)</term><term>Models, Anatomic</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted (methods)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur ()</term><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle ()</term><term>Mandibule ()</term><term>Mandibule (imagerie diagnostique)</term><term>Modèles anatomiques</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Mâchoire édentée (rééducation et réadaptation)</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux (instrumentation)</term><term>Projets pilotes</term><term>Radiographie</term><term>Radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnostic imaging" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="imagerie diagnostique" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mandibule</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Implantation, Endosseous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</term><term>Surgery, Computer-Assisted</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rehabilitation" xml:lang="en"><term>Jaw, Edentulous</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="rééducation et réadaptation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mâchoire édentée</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Mandible</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Dental Models</term><term>Humans</term><term>Models, Anatomic</term><term>Patient Care Planning</term><term>Pilot Projects</term><term>Radiography</term><term>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="instrumentation" xml:lang="fr"><term>Chirurgie assistée par ordinateur</term><term>Humains</term><term>Imagerie tridimensionnelle</term><term>Mandibule</term><term>Modèles anatomiques</term><term>Modèles dentaires</term><term>Planification des soins du patient</term><term>Pose d'implant dentaire endo-osseux</term><term>Projets pilotes</term><term>Radiographie</term><term>Radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité</term><term>Reproductibilité des résultats</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This pilot study assesses the accuracy of 2 bone-supported stereolithographic surgical templates with respect to placement of implants in originally planned positions, and it tests the precision of dental volumetric tomography planning. Two mandibles retrieved from formalin-fixed human cadavers were scanned by dental volumetric tomography for planning of the implant positions, leading to stereolithographic models and fabrication of surgical guides. The situation immediately following drilling and implant insertion by an experienced surgeon was scanned and the outcome compared with the initial planning. The 3-dimensional discrepancies were then analyzed and determined. The results show deviations of the placed implants from the original planning, especially in the vertical direction, making the seating of a prefabricated denture impossible. At present, the flapless surgery technique based on stereolithographic surgical templates appears unsafe; further improvement is required.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">21126171</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2013</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>08</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2016</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>25</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0160-6972</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>38</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><Year>2012</Year><Month>Oct</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>The Journal of oral implantology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>J Oral Implantol</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Precision of implant placement with stereolithographic templates: a pilot in vitro study.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>569-74</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00109</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText>This pilot study assesses the accuracy of 2 bone-supported stereolithographic surgical templates with respect to placement of implants in originally planned positions, and it tests the precision of dental volumetric tomography planning. Two mandibles retrieved from formalin-fixed human cadavers were scanned by dental volumetric tomography for planning of the implant positions, leading to stereolithographic models and fabrication of surgical guides. The situation immediately following drilling and implant insertion by an experienced surgeon was scanned and the outcome compared with the initial planning. The 3-dimensional discrepancies were then analyzed and determined. The results show deviations of the placed implants from the original planning, especially in the vertical direction, making the seating of a prefabricated denture impossible. At present, the flapless surgery technique based on stereolithographic surgical templates appears unsafe; further improvement is required.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bilhan</LastName><ForeName>Hakan</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Department of Prosthodontics, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Arat</LastName><ForeName>Selda</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mumcu</LastName><ForeName>Emre</ForeName><Initials>E</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Geckili</LastName><ForeName>Onur</ForeName><Initials>O</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Sakar</LastName><ForeName>Olcay</ForeName><Initials>O</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D003160">Comparative Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D023362">Evaluation Studies</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>02</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>J Oral Implantol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>7801086</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0160-6972</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>D</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003758" MajorTopicYN="N">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000295" MajorTopicYN="Y">instrumentation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003765" MajorTopicYN="Y">Dental Models</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D021621" MajorTopicYN="N">Imaging, Three-Dimensional</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007575" MajorTopicYN="N">Jaw, Edentulous</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000534" MajorTopicYN="N">rehabilitation</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008334" MajorTopicYN="N">Mandible</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000000981" MajorTopicYN="N">diagnostic imaging</QualifierName><QualifierName UI="Q000601" MajorTopicYN="Y">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D008953" MajorTopicYN="N">Models, Anatomic</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010347" MajorTopicYN="N">Patient Care Planning</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010865" MajorTopicYN="N">Pilot Projects</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011859" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiography</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D050397" MajorTopicYN="N">Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015203" MajorTopicYN="N">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D025321" MajorTopicYN="N">Surgery, Computer-Assisted</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000379" MajorTopicYN="Y">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2010</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2013</Year><Month>1</Month><Day>9</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21126171</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00109</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Turquie</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Arat, Selda" sort="Arat, Selda" uniqKey="Arat S" first="Selda" last="Arat">Selda Arat</name><name sortKey="Geckili, Onur" sort="Geckili, Onur" uniqKey="Geckili O" first="Onur" last="Geckili">Onur Geckili</name><name sortKey="Mumcu, Emre" sort="Mumcu, Emre" uniqKey="Mumcu E" first="Emre" last="Mumcu">Emre Mumcu</name><name sortKey="Sakar, Olcay" sort="Sakar, Olcay" uniqKey="Sakar O" first="Olcay" last="Sakar">Olcay Sakar</name></noCountry><country name="Turquie"><noRegion><name sortKey="Bilhan, Hakan" sort="Bilhan, Hakan" uniqKey="Bilhan H" first="Hakan" last="Bilhan">Hakan Bilhan</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000C85 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000C85 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Checkpoint
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:21126171
|texte= Precision of implant placement with stereolithographic templates: a pilot in vitro study.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:21126171" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |